When doing peer reviews, I read through the paper and make comments on anything that stands out to me. As I was commenting on my peers paper, I made comments on various things, mostly relating to clarification. If I read something that was a little confusing or didn’t make complete sense, I made a comment suggesting the writer to elaborate more on the idea to ensure that it is more straightforward. I try to point out things that don’t flow in the essay so they can make it more relevant to their argument. For example, my peer stated in their first body paragraph of their art and science essay that “Neuroscience is a powerful science” and proceeded to explain how art has to potential to expand this field of science. This was argued before they even introduce what their career path will be (Occupational Therapy) and how it relates to neuroscience. I suggested that they should introduce their projected career earlier in the essay and that it is important for them to explain how occupational therapy and neuroscience intertwine. I also make sure my peers are connecting quotes directly to their paragraph argument as well as the thesis. While giving this suggestion, I also try to help my peer use their own voice and not to let the quote overpower their own opinion. When I am peer reviewing, I find it more beneficial to the writer if I make constructive comments while also adding in compliments as well. I let my peers know when they have made a strong and interesting point and when they convey their message clearly. When I first started peer reviewing, I was afraid of being too critical or being offensive. I soon found out that I prefer it when my peers give me constructive criticism, rather than saying my essay was good. It’s always easier for someone else to notice mistakes in our essays and receiving real feedback is the only way to actually make improvements in our writing. Peer reviews are very vital to the recursive writing process.